U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Asemani v. Chronister

Asemani v. Chronister
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 22, 2010 · Davis, Motz, Niemeyer
371 F. App'x 392

Counsel

Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Asemani v. Chronister

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Billy G. Asemani, a frequent filer, appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants on Asemani’s action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Asemani v. Chronister, No. 1:09-cv-00238-RDB, 2009 WL 3100589 (D.Md. Sept. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.