U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Cascio v. Maryland

Cascio v. Maryland
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 2, 2010 · Gregory, Shedd, Wilkinson
372 F. App'x 368

Cascio v. Maryland

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Harry James Cascio appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cascio v. State of Maryland, No. 8:09-cv-01938-RWT, 2009 WL 2913485 (D.Md. Sept. 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.