U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Thomas

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 5, 2010 · Gregory, Shedd, Wilkinson

372 F. App'x 378

Counsel

Lyndell Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lyndell Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thomas, No. 3:93-cr-00058-BR-3, 2009 WL 3300255 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument *379because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.