U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Regan v. Johns

Regan v. Johns
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 23, 2010 · Davis, Motz, Niemeyer
372 F. App'x 395

Counsel

Cornelius Maurice Regan, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Bredenberg, Office of the United States Attorney, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, Michael Lockridge, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Regan v. Johns

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cornelius Maurice Regan, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Regan v. Johns, No. 5:08-hc02055-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.