U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

In re Henriques

In re Henriques
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 2, 2010 · Gregory, Shedd, Wilkinson
372 F. App'x 436

In re Henriques

Opinion of the Court

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding-precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ewin Henriques petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion filed in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) proceeding. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court denied the motion on January 15, 2010. Accordingly, because the district court has *437recently decided Henriques’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We deny Henriques’s motion for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.