U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Decator

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 6, 2010 · Gregory, Shedd, Wilkinson

373 F. App'x 330

Counsel

Kittrell Bernard Decator, Appellant Pro Se. James G. Warwick, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Kittrell Bernard Decator appeals the district court’s margin order denying De-cator’s “Motion to Dismiss Indictment Nunc Pro Tunc.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Decator, No. 1:95-cr-00202-CCB-1 (D.Md. Dec. 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.