U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Vereen

United States v. Vereen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 27, 2010 · Agee, King, Traxler
375 F. App'x 340

Counsel

Luther Vereen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Vereen

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Luther Vereen, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Vereen, No. 4:03-cr-00271-CWH-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.