U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Vereen

United States v. Vereen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 27, 2010 · Agee, King, Traxler
375 F. App'x 340

United States v. Vereen

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Luther Vereen, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Vereen, No. 4:03-cr-00271-CWH-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.