U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Stephens

United States v. Stephens
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 4, 2010 · Duncan, Hamilton, Motz
376 F. App'x 295

United States v. Stephens

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lorenzo Deshon Stephens appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Stephens, No. 3:06-cr-00281-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. Dec. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.