U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Steglich

United States v. Steglich
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 28, 2010 · Agee, King, Traxler
376 F. App'x 312

United States v. Steglich

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lance Bishop Steglieh appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his second motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Steglich, No. 3:00-cr-00063-jpj-9 (W.D.Va. Dec. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.