U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Steglich

United States v. Steglich
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 28, 2010 · Agee, King, Traxler
376 F. App'x 312

Counsel

Lance Bishop Steglieh, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Steglich

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lance Bishop Steglieh appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his second motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Steglich, No. 3:00-cr-00063-jpj-9 (W.D.Va. Dec. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.