U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Anneheim

United States v. Anneheim
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 17, 2010 · Agee, Hamilton, Wilkinson
378 F. App'x 369

United States v. Anneheim

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Ferdinand Anneheim appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Anneheim, No. 5:99-cr-00020-RLV-2 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.