U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Rochester v. South Carolina

Rochester v. South Carolina
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 18, 2010 · Duncan, Traxler, Wilkinson
378 F. App'x 374

Rochester v. South Carolina

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Julian Edward Rochester appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rochester v. South Carolina, No. 2:09-cv-03148-HMH-SC (D.S.C. Dec. 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the *375decisional process. The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.