U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Rudisill

United States v. Rudisill
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 27, 2010 · Davis, Niemeyer, Wilkinson
380 F. App'x 309

United States v. Rudisill

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Donnell Rudisill appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rudisill, No. 1:01-cr-00048-MR-7 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.