U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Rudisill

United States v. Rudisill
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 27, 2010 · Davis, Niemeyer, Wilkinson
380 F. App'x 309

Counsel

Richard Donnell Rudisill, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Jill Westmoreland Rose, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Rudisill

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Donnell Rudisill appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rudisill, No. 1:01-cr-00048-MR-7 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.