U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Hinton v. Trans Union LLC

Hinton v. Trans Union LLC
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 8, 2010 · Duncan, Motz, Shedd
382 F. App'x 256

Counsel

Kenneth Hinton, Appellant Pro Se. Erik J. Grohmann, Paul L. Myers, Stras-burger & Price, LLP, Frisco, Texas; Kea-sha Ann Broussard, Barry Goheen, King & Spalding, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; Jonathan S. Hubbard, Troutman Sanders, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Hinton v. Trans Union LLC

Cases that cite this one

79 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Hinton appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss his second amended complaint alleging claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hinton v. Trans Union LLC, 654 F.Supp.2d 440 (E.D.Va. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.