U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Reeves v. Nuvox Communications, Inc.

Reeves v. Nuvox Communications, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 23, 2010 · Hamilton, King, Motz
384 F. App'x 255

Counsel

Michael Ladale Reeves, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edgar McDonald, III, John Timothy Merrell, Madison Baker Wyche, III, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Reeves v. Nuvox Communications, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ladale Reeves appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendant’s summary judgment motion on his discrimination and retaliation claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.A. § 12101 to § 12213 (West 2005 & Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Reeves v. Nuvox Commc’ns, Inc., No. 6:08-cv-04031-HMH, 2009 WL 4016617 (D.S.C. Nov. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.