U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Harrison v. Sprinkle

Harrison v. Sprinkle
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 25, 2010 · Hamilton, King, Motz
385 F. App'x 310

Harrison v. Sprinkle

Opinion of the Court

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Niles Harrison appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrison v. Major Sprinkle, No. 2:10-cv-00046-RBS-FBS (E.D.Va. Feb. 4, 2010). We deny Harrison’s informal complaint motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.