U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Terrell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 28, 2010 · Hamilton, King, Motz

385 F. App'x 327

Counsel

Brooks James Terrell, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brooks James Terrell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Terrell, No. 7:99-cr-00610-HMH-1 (D.S.C. Mar. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because *328the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.