U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Larue v. Matheney

Larue v. Matheney
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 28, 2010 · Hamilton, King, Motz
385 F. App'x 328

Larue v. Matheney

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William A. LaRue appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. LaRue v. Matheney, No. 2:08-cv-00983, 2010 WL 786249 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 4, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.