U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Johnson v. Bailey

Johnson v. Bailey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 28, 2010 · Hamilton, King, Motz
385 F. App'x 333

Johnson v. Bailey

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Zane A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Bailey, No. 5:10-cv-00016-GCM, 2010 WL 703056 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.