United States v. Crook
United States v. Crook
389 F. App'x 212
United States v. Crook
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Samuel Paul Crook appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Crook, No. 3:04-cr-00058-MR-l (W.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.