U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Cupp v. Brown

Cupp v. Brown
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 4, 2010 · Keenan, Traxler, Wilkinson
390 F. App'x 228

Cupp v. Brown

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Cupp appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cupp v. Brown, No. 2:08-cv-00060-REM-JSK, 2009 WL 3711954 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral ai'gument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.