U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Clark v. Harrison

Clark v. Harrison
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 6, 2010 · Keenan, Traxler, Wilkinson
390 F. App'x 258

Clark v. Harrison

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Orlando Rapheal Clark appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clark v. Harrison, No. 5:08-ct-03114-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.