U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Young

United States v. Young
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 9, 2010 · Keenan, Traxler, Wilkinson
390 F. App'x 267

United States v. Young

Opinion of the Court

*268Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Arnold Young appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Young, No. 1:88-cr-00112-1, 2010 WL 1790438 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.