U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Akinro v. King Castle Motel

Akinro v. King Castle Motel
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 27, 2010 · Agee, Gregory, Motz
393 F. App'x 90

Akinro v. King Castle Motel

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Akinro v. King Castle Motel, No. 1:10-cv-01405-RDB (D. Md. June 7, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.