U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Childress v. Pettiford

Childress v. Pettiford
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 27, 2010 · Agee, Gregory, Motz
393 F. App'x 92

Counsel

Eric Childress, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murder Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Childress v. Pettiford

Opinion of the Court

*93Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Childress appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Childress v. Pettiford, No. 4:08-cv-01001-SB, 2010 WL 412547 (D.S.C. Jan. 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.