U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Bailey v. Black Entertainment Television, Inc.

Bailey v. Black Entertainment Television, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 1, 2010 · Duncan, Hamilton, King
393 F. App'x 971

Counsel

Samuel G. Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. John B. O’Keefe, Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appel-lees.

Bailey v. Black Entertainment Television, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel G. Bailey appeals the district court’s order denying his copyright complaint against Black Entertainment Television, Inc. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bailey v. Black Entm’t Television, Inc., No. 3:009-cv-00787-JRS, 2010 WL 1780403 (E.D.Va. May 3, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are- adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.