U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Adams

United States v. Adams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 2, 2010 · Duncan, Hamilton, King
393 F. App'x 981

Counsel

Kenyatta Hasani Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Adams

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenyatta Hasani Adams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Adams, No. 2:07-cr-00113-RGD-JEB-1 (E.D.Va. filed Feb. 24, 2010 & entered Feb. 26, 2010); see also Dillon v. United States, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 2693-94, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010) (holding that United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), does not apply to § 3582(c)(2) proceedings). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.