U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Brown v. Mathena

Brown v. Mathena
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 3, 2010 · Duncan, Hamilton, King
393 F. App'x 987

Brown v. Mathena

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clayton Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Mathena, No. 7:10-cv-00192-sgw-mfu, 2010 WL 1965105 (WJD.Va. May 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *988the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.