U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Brown v. Mathena

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 3, 2010 · Duncan, Hamilton, King

393 F. App'x 987

Counsel

Clayton Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Bleil v. Unknown Named Staff of WRSP (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2022)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clayton Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Mathena, No. 7:10-cv-00192-sgw-mfu, 2010 WL 1965105 (WJD.Va. May 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *988the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.