Brown v. Mathena
Brown v. Mathena
393 F. App'x 987
Brown v. Mathena
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Clayton Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Mathena, No. 7:10-cv-00192-sgw-mfu, 2010 WL 1965105 (WJD.Va. May 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.