U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Rash

United States v. Rash
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 3, 2010 · Duncan, Hamilton, King
393 F. App'x 997

United States v. Rash

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Emanuel Rash appeals the district court’s orders denying his “Motion for Judicial Recommendation Regarding Designation for Service of Federal Sentence” and subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rash, No. 3:01-cr-00025-JPB-DJJ-1 (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 28 & Feb. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.