U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Cargill v. United States

Cargill v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 10, 2010 · Agee, Motz, Shedd
394 F. App'x 981

Counsel

Frederick Anthony Cargill, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Cargill v. United States

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Anthony Cargill appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his motion for a writ pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cargill v. United States, No. 1:09-cv-00861-JAB-PTS (M.D.N.C. Dec. 30, 2009). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. *982We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.