U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Boyd

United States v. Boyd
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 7, 2010 · Duncan, Hamilton, King
395 F. App'x 61

United States v. Boyd

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Lee Boyd, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to enforce the plea agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Boyd, No. 5:93-cr-00123-F-3 (E.D.N.C. June 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.