U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Barnes v. Dedmondt

Barnes v. Dedmondt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 22, 2010 · Duncan, Gregory, King
395 F. App'x 928

Counsel

Steven Lewis Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Daniel C. Plyler, Davidson, Morrison & Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Barnes v. Dedmondt

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Steven Lewis Barnes appeals the district court’s orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying reconsideration. Barnes also challenges several pretrial orders denying appointment of counsel, denying extensions of time for discovery and to object to the report and recommendation, and denying recusal of the magistrate judge. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barnes v. Dedmondt, No. 4:08-cv-00002-MBS, 2009 WL 3166576 (D.S.C. Sept. 29 & Dec. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.