United States v. Cross
United States v. Cross
396 F. App'x 910
United States v. Cross
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
William Terrence Cross appeals the district court’s margin order denying his motion for lack of personal jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.