U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Lazo

United States v. Lazo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 5, 2010 · Davis, Shedd, Wilkinson
396 F. App'x 914

United States v. Lazo

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Melba Noely Lazo appeals the district court’s order denying her “Reconsideration motion to reduce sentence minor participation.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lazo, No. 1:08-cr00126-LMB-2 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 22, 2010; entered Apr. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.