U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Smith

United States v. Smith
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 8, 2010 · Gregory, Motz, Niemeyer
396 F. App'x 924

United States v. Smith

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Allen Smith, Jr., appeals the district court’s “Order Reducing Term of Imprisonment as a Result of Amended Guideline Range Pursuant to [U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § ] 1B1.10 [ (2008) ].” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 2:00-er-00007-FPS-JES-l (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.