U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Smith

United States v. Smith
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 8, 2010 · Gregory, Motz, Niemeyer
396 F. App'x 924

Counsel

Richard Allen Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Donald Warner, Assistant United States Attorney, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Smith

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Allen Smith, Jr., appeals the district court’s “Order Reducing Term of Imprisonment as a Result of Amended Guideline Range Pursuant to [U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § ] 1B1.10 [ (2008) ].” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 2:00-er-00007-FPS-JES-l (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.