U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Buzzell v. Wallin

Buzzell v. Wallin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 1, 2010 · Davis, Shedd, Wilkinson
396 F. App'x 956

Counsel

Stephen F. Buzzell, Kimberly B. Buzzell, Appellants Pro Se. Andrew Biondi, Sands Anderson, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Charles Franklin Midkiff, Michael R. Spit-zer, II, Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Melissa Briggs, Robert William Metzler, United States Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Buzzell v. Wallin

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding-precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephen F. Buzzell and Kimberly B. Buzzell appeal the district court’s order granting in part their motion for voluntary dismissal and its subsequent order denying reconsideration and granting the Government’s Fed.R.CivJP. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Buzzell v. Wallin, No. 3:09-cv-00795-HEH, 2010 WL 4131399 (E.D. Va. May 11, 2010); 2010 WL 2399685 (June 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.