U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Crook

United States v. Crook
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 4, 2010 · Davis, Shedd, Wilkinson
396 F. App'x 969

United States v. Crook

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Paul Crook appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for ap*970pointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Crook, No. 3:04-cr-00059-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.