U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Clement v. LaHood

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 7, 2010 · King, Motz, Niemeyer

397 F. App'x 859

Counsel

Audrey Clement, John Reeder, Appellants Pro Se. Allen M. Brabender, Bernard G. Kim, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; Christopher Dwight Eib, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE ERIE UNIT 2262 v. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania 2022)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Audrey Clement and John Reeder appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Government and dismissing Clement’s civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Clement and Reeder’s motion for a stay pending appeal and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clement v. LaHood, No. 1:09-cv-01056-CMH-IDD, 2010 WL 1779701 (E.D.Va. Apr. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *860materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.