U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Young

United States v. Young
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 8, 2010 · Agee, Keenan, Niemeyer
397 F. App'x 860

Counsel

Larry Arnold Young, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Ap-pellee.

United States v. Young

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Arnold Young appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Young, No. 1:88-cr-00112-1 (S.D.W.Va. May 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.