U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Riddick

United States v. Riddick
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 13, 2010 · Gregory, Keenan, King
397 F. App'x 870

United States v. Riddick

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John D. Riddick, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Riddick, No. 2:00-cr-00067-JBF-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *871in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.