U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Dais

United States v. Dais
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 6, 2010 · Davis, Shedd, Wilkinson
397 F. App'x 902

Counsel

Norman Tyrone Dais, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Dais

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Norman Tyrone Dais appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for production of documents for his inspection. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Dais has not given any substantial reason for granting the request. We also deny his motion for an expedited appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.