U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

In re Jones

In re Jones
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 20, 2010 · Davis, King, Motz
398 F. App'x 896

In re Jones

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Michael Forrest Jones petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his civil action. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.