Stuart Wayne Tompkins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tompkins v. Mitchell, No. l:08-cv-00322-GCM, 2009 WL 995573 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 2009). Tompkins’ motions for default judgment, for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, and for appointment of counsel are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.