U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2010

Tompkins v. Mitchell

Tompkins v. Mitchell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 25, 2010 · Gregory, Shedd, Wilkinson
398 F. App'x 921

Counsel

Stuart Wayne Tompkins, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Tompkins v. Mitchell

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Stuart Wayne Tompkins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tompkins v. Mitchell, No. l:08-cv-00322-GCM, 2009 WL 995573 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 2009). Tompkins’ motions for default judgment, for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, and for appointment of counsel are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.