Worsley v. Perdue
Worsley v. Perdue
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1848
EDDIE LEE WORSLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BEVERLY PERDUE, Governor, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:10-cv-00257-D)
Submitted: December 21, 2010 Decided: January 3, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Lee Worsley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Eddie Lee Worsley appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because Worsley’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Worsley has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.