Muwwakkil v.Johnson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Muwwakkil v.Johnson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7373

KAMAL S. MUWWAKKIL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GENE M. JOHNSON; LARRY HUFFMAN; JOHN S. GARMAN; LINDA B. SHEAR; BRYAN S. WATSON; A. P. HARVEY; J. COMBS; P. SCARBERRY; J. MCQUEEN, Sergeant; M. MCBRIDE; T. THOMPSON; BRENDA RAVIZEE; G. ROBINSON; M. HENSLEY,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:09-cv-00318-gec-mfu)

Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: January 13, 2011

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kamal S. Muwwakkil, Appellant Pro Se. Banci Enga Tewolde, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Jim H. Guynn, Jr., GUYNN, MEMMER & DILLON, PC, Salem, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kamal S. Muwwakkil appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Muwwakkil v. Johnson, No. 7:09-cv-00318-gec-mfu (W.D.

Va. Sept. 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished