Muwwakkil v.Johnson
Muwwakkil v.Johnson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7373
KAMAL S. MUWWAKKIL, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. GENE M. JOHNSON; LARRY HUFFMAN; JOHN S. GARMAN; LINDA B.
SHEAR; BRYAN S. WATSON; A. P. HARVEY; J. COMBS; P. SCARBERRY; J. MCQUEEN, Sergeant; M. MCBRIDE; T. THOMPSON; BRENDA RAVIZEE; G. ROBINSON; M. HENSLEY, Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:09-cv-00318-gec-mfu)
Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: January 13, 2011
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kamal S. Muwwakkil, Appellant Pro Se. Banci Enga Tewolde, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Jim H. Guynn, Jr., GUYNN, MEMMER & DILLON, PC, Salem, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Kamal S. Muwwakkil appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muwwakkil v. Johnson, No. 7:09-cv-00318-gec-mfu (W.D.
Va. Sept. 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.