Sutherland v. Commissioner Social Security
Sutherland v. Commissioner Social Security
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1793
VIRGIL H. SUTHERLAND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00541-MR)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 18, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Virgil H. Sutherland, Appellant Pro Se. Rami M. Vanegas, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Virgil H. Sutherland appeals the district court’s
order granting the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment,
and affirming the decision of the Commissioner to deny
Sutherland disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Sutherland v. Comm’r
of Soc. Sec., No. 1:08-cv-00541-MR (W.D.N.C. June 28, 2010). We
grant Sutherland leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished