United States v. Hairston
United States v. Hairston
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7310
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00024-JPB-JES-1)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 20, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate
judge and denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(2006) motion to modify
his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Hairston, No.
3:00-cr-00024-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 3, 2010). We deny
Hairston’s “Motion for the Court to Issue an Order.” We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished